同<关于费尔巴哈的提纲>中的两处论断均非本质论,前者处在人类学层次,后者处在社会学层次." />
The server is under maintenance between 08:00 to 12:00 (GMT+08:00), and please visit later.
We apologize for any inconvenience caused
Login  | Sign Up  |  Oriprobe Inc. Feed
China/Asia On Demand
Journal Articles
Laws/Policies/Regulations
Companies/Products
Bookmark and Share
Discussion on the View of Practice of the Nature of Human Beings in Marx
Author(s): 
Pages: 40-43,83
Year: Issue:  4
Journal: JOURNAL OF TANGSHAN TEACHERS COLLEGE

Keyword:  马克思人的本质实践社会关系;
Abstract: 针对国内学者普遍将"实践"视作马克思人的本质的本体论蕴涵这一研究现状,笔者经过考察认为,对马克思人的本质问题的学术研究在研究方法、逻辑结构以及认识目的三个方面存有局限.通过综观原著得出结论:<1844年经济学--哲学手稿>同<关于费尔巴哈的提纲>中的两处论断均非本质论,前者处在人类学层次,后者处在社会学层次.
Related Articles
No related articles found