The server is under maintenance between 08:00 to 12:00 (GMT+08:00), and please visit later.
We apologize for any inconvenience caused
Login  | Sign Up  |  Oriprobe Inc. Feed
China/Asia On Demand
Journal Articles
Laws/Policies/Regulations
Companies/Products
Bookmark and Share
bu tong fang fa xue jian ce xi ning di qu lao nian ren mei du kang ti de xue qing xue jie guo bi jiao fen xi
Author(s): 
Pages: 41-42
Year: Issue:  4
Journal: Qinghai Medical Journal

Keyword:  TP-ELISATPPA老年人梅毒抗体;
Abstract: 目的:用不同方法(TP-ELISA、TPPA)检测西宁地区老年人梅毒的结果比较分析,通过比较不同梅毒检测方法的敏感性和特异性,选择更合理的方法应用于老年人梅毒患者的检测。方法:搜集于我院临床疑似有梅毒的老年患者300例为病例组;800例有疑似梅毒的中青年组为对照组,分别进行TP-ELISA、TPPA试验。结果:300例老年组用TP-ELISA法检出梅毒阳性59例,阳性率为19.7%,TPPA检出梅毒阳性22例,阳性率为7.33%;800例对照组用TP-ELISA法检出阳性为49例,阳性率为6.13%,TPPA检出阳性为39例,阳性率为4.88%。结论:老年组TP-ELISA法检测的阳性率明显高于中青年组,而用TPPA法检测两组结果无差异,说明梅毒抗体阳性率与年龄、疾病及检测方法有很大的关系,也是造成老年人梅毒抗体易产生假阳性的重要原因。
Related Articles
No related articles found