The server is under maintenance between 08:00 to 12:00 (GMT+08:00), and please visit later.
We apologize for any inconvenience caused
Login  | Sign Up  |  Oriprobe Inc. Feed
China/Asia On Demand
Journal Articles
Laws/Policies/Regulations
Companies/Products
Evidence Competency and Exclusion: Comparison and Review among Civil, Criminal and Administrative Litigations
Author(s): 
Pages: 389-407
Year: Issue:  4
Journal: Evidence Seience

Keyword:  证据适格性证据排除三大诉讼比较与检视;
Abstract: 非法证据排除规则与证据适格性之间的关系,是一种相辅相成的关系.从本质意义上讲,凡是在法律上被认为丧失或者欠缺证据适格性的证据,都应当在诉讼中受到排除而不得使用.诉讼的最终裁判结果所体现的公正性应当以程序正义为基础,而程序正义则包括诉讼过程的正当性,即为法律所允许的证据表现形式或者证据方法、取得有关证据资料或者信息来源的手段、方法以及法院在庭审中所采取的证据调查方式的合法性与有效性,这些均为程序正义所能够延及的空间与领域.反映在三大诉讼证据制度上,证据适格性与证据排除既有共性又有差异,并且差异往往要大于共性.
Related Articles
loading...