The server is under maintenance between 08:00 to 12:00 (GMT+08:00), and please visit later.
We apologize for any inconvenience caused
Login
|
Sign Up
|
Oriprobe Inc.
|
Feed
Home
Journals
Order
TOC Alerts
Subscription
Products & Services
Pricing
FAQ
About
Journal Articles
Laws/Policies/Regulations
Companies/Products
Title, abstract, keywords:
Combined Search
Advanced Search
Pay per View through On Demand Search
Package:
ALL
Astro-Earth Science
Agriculture
Physics
Mathematics
Arts & Humanities
Medline Collection
Health/Medicine/Biology
Chemistry/Chemical Engineering
CAOD
English Journals
Traditional Chinese Medicine
NPC CPPCC Journals
Author:
Journal / Book Title:
Year:
Volume:
Issue:
wo guo bi jiao zhe xue yan jiu ( san )
Author(s):
LI Jiehua
Pages:
39
-
43
Year:
1987
Issue:
3
Journal:
Philosophical Trends
Keyword:
亚里士多德逻辑
;
墨辩逻辑
;
中国传统文化
;
形式逻辑
;
逻辑比较
;
逻辑科学
;
人文精神
;
作用范围
;
社会政治
;
社会科学院
;
Abstract:
<正> 一○中西逻辑比较傅季重、蒋弋为认为亚里士多德逻辑和墨辩逻辑的差异是:(1) 前者主要是学术探讨的工具,后者则是用来解决社会政治、认识事物、学术探讨一切问题的工具,其作用范围比前者大得多;(2) 前者和后者在形式和内容方面也是不同的。冯契、陈正夫、张立文等都不同意中国哲学长于伦理而忽视逻辑的观点,认为从逻辑思维领域来说,在中国的先秦与西方的古希腊,都已建立了形式逻辑科学和提出朴素的辩证逻
Citations
No citation found
Related Articles
No related articles found