The server is under maintenance between 08:00 to 12:00 (GMT+08:00), and please visit later.
We apologize for any inconvenience caused
Login  | Sign Up  |  Oriprobe Inc. Feed
China/Asia On Demand
Journal Articles
Laws/Policies/Regulations
Companies/Products
Bookmark and Share
meng te li er ding yi yu rdq ping fen dui wei shi guan fan liu bing de zhen duan jia zhi
Author(s): 
Pages: 3069-3071
Year: Issue:  18
Journal: The Journal of Practical Medicine

Keyword:  反流性疾病问卷蒙特利尔定义胃食管反流病;
Abstract: 目的:通过比较胃食管反流病(gastroesophageal reflux disease,GERD)问卷的不同评价方式,评价问卷价值.方法:对312例患者进行反流性疾病问卷调查、胃镜及动态食管pH监测,以胃镜或pH监测作为诊断GERD的“金标准”,比较反流性疾病诊断问卷(reflux disease questionnaire,RDQ)、蒙特利尔定义的差异.结果:RDQ诊断GERD敏感度为67.3%,特异度为78.8%,好于蒙特利尔定义,两者之间之间及其与“金标准”的Kappa检验值分别为0.549,0.204,0.551.结论:两种评分之间及与“金标准”均存在中等程度的一致性,但该组病例中“RDQ评分”要优于“蒙特利尔定义”.
Related Articles
No related articles found