The server is under maintenance between 08:00 to 12:00 (GMT+08:00), and please visit
later.
We apologize for any inconvenience caused
Comparison of two kinds of lavaging methods for trophoblastic cells
Author(s): L(U) Jing-yuan, ZHANG Yan, HU Yu-hong, ZHANG Dan-fng
Pages: 29-
31
Year: 2007
Issue:
1
Journal: HEILONGJIANG MEDICINE AND PHARMACY
Keyword: 官腔冲洗; 早孕; 滋养细胞; 免疫组化;
Abstract: 目的:通过对两种冲洗法在子宫下段获取滋养细胞的比较研究,探索一种适合于孕早期产前诊断的、安全无损伤的获取胎儿细胞的取样方法.方法:①对拟行人工流产的46例早孕妇行循环子宫腔冲洗,与38例单腔冲洗管样本进行比较,研究获取胎儿滋养细胞的情况.②对获取的滋养细胞行免疫组化鉴定.③对拟行药物流产的早孕妇行两种子宫腔冲洗,探索取样操作对孕妇及胎儿的短期影响.结果:双腔循环宫腔冲洗法比单腔冲洗法获取滋养细胞的例数高(73.9%,44.8%,P<0.05);APAAP免疫组化试验表明,多核细胞能与抗滋养细胞多克隆抗体及单克隆抗体发生强阳性反应;冲洗取样操作短期(3d)内观察未发生流产、感染、腹痛等异常情况.结论:①孕早期在宫腔内可以收集到胎儿滋养细胞.免疫组化研究进一步证实它的性质.②双腔循环宫腔冲洗法与单腔宫腔冲洗法相比,取样效果更优越.③冲洗法简便易行.短期观察对母儿是安全的.
Citations
No citation found